But, would the same synth have sold as many licenses as are used cracked? Courts will count the number of existing cracks and just claculate a sum from that. This leads to the real question: Do cracks prevent selling more licenses? And that I doubt. If a creator of a synth makes money, it's more likely that the synth will be kept alive. Supporting a product after release costs money. If a synth gets updated, gets fresh presets, has a fanbase that shares tips and tricks, and so on. The only way to have an advantage when using a synth is its lifetime support. And my answer will concentrate on this alone. Is it an advantage to own a license of a product that isn't cracked? I understand this as the main question. I guess that the only vst that comes close would be a sample based one (nexus for. For me it sounded better than any vsti i used/heard.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |